<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Katy McDermott</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.katymcdermott.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.katymcdermott.com</link>
	<description>The writer next door</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 03:22:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Long Road to Quitting Smoking and the International Secret Society of Ex-Nicotine Addicts by Daniel Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.katymcdermott.com/2010/02/19/my-long-road-to-quitting-smoking-and-the-international-secret-society-of-ex-nicotine-addicts/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 03:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katymcdermott.com/?p=223#comment-333</guid>
		<description>oh well, nicotine is the number cause of lung disease. this substance can really kill your lungs.~:&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh well, nicotine is the number cause of lung disease. this substance can really kill your lungs.~:&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wrong and Wronger by Ryuei</title>
		<link>http://www.katymcdermott.com/2010/07/15/wrong-and-wronger/comment-page-1/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryuei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 19:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katymcdermott.com/?p=292#comment-332</guid>
		<description>Thanks Katy. My friend Max pointed out, however, that cable shows are appealing to much smaller (though more vocal) audiences than the networks of the past. But certainly even in the pre-internet days someone like Joseph McCarthy could and did do a lot of damage to a lot of innocent people before they self-destruct and/or get shut down. 

I have to agree with Andrew that there is also a lot of laziness. I have to cop to it as well. I don&#039;t take the time to delve deeply into all the political issues (too busy searching for funny videos and Buddhist rap songs on youtube). People satisfy themselves with sound-bites instead of really trying to understand all the complexities of the issues that they are reducing to bumper-sticker slogans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Katy. My friend Max pointed out, however, that cable shows are appealing to much smaller (though more vocal) audiences than the networks of the past. But certainly even in the pre-internet days someone like Joseph McCarthy could and did do a lot of damage to a lot of innocent people before they self-destruct and/or get shut down. </p>
<p>I have to agree with Andrew that there is also a lot of laziness. I have to cop to it as well. I don&#8217;t take the time to delve deeply into all the political issues (too busy searching for funny videos and Buddhist rap songs on youtube). People satisfy themselves with sound-bites instead of really trying to understand all the complexities of the issues that they are reducing to bumper-sticker slogans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wrong and Wronger by Faith</title>
		<link>http://www.katymcdermott.com/2010/07/15/wrong-and-wronger/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Faith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 02:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katymcdermott.com/?p=292#comment-317</guid>
		<description>Our Second Civil War will definitely not be civil!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our Second Civil War will definitely not be civil!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wrong and Wronger by Andrew Runion</title>
		<link>http://www.katymcdermott.com/2010/07/15/wrong-and-wronger/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Runion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katymcdermott.com/?p=292#comment-316</guid>
		<description>I get the sense from what you’ve said and from your writing that you enjoy political discussion.  Have you read the David McCullough John Adams book, or, at least, seen the HBO miniseries (which was great, by the way)?

I found it fascinating.

Here’s why.  John Adams, who believed that a strong central government was required to financially provide for the common welfare, and Thomas Jefferson, who believed that federal government should be limited so as not to infringe upon the independence of states, were close friends.  They competed politically.  Adams even lost the Presidency after a single term to Jefferson, but they remained cordial and, in a way, remained allies.

The two had common ground, a belief that individual freedoms should be upheld at all costs, lest the revolution be a vain pursuit, and the United States become just another tyrannical monarchy.

Today, the root of their two opposing beliefs remain, but the common ground has all but vanished. Instead of demanding our freedom to write, interpret and enforce our own law, we have lost interest in the governance of the United States and are content to rely on our elected officials to “know better” than we do.  So, when our legislators and executives take actions that are contrary to the wishes of the citizens they govern, we sit back and allow them to be re-elected, or worse, we begrudgingly pull the lever for one of a handful of pre-selected individuals that a group in Washington, over which we have no control, has selected for us.  Democrats may recall that sentiment in 1984, when Mondale was their only option.  For Republicans, it was McCain in 2008.

The truth is, I’m losing sympathy for my fellow Americans (myself included), who won’t bother to truly engage in the freedoms for which people like Adams and Jefferson risked their lives. Instead we take Rush’s word for it.  We take Matt Damon’s word for it.  We take anyone’s word for it except our own, and we choose from our pre-selected reality-show-esque candidates based upon surface-level impressions and sheer laziness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get the sense from what you’ve said and from your writing that you enjoy political discussion.  Have you read the David McCullough John Adams book, or, at least, seen the HBO miniseries (which was great, by the way)?</p>
<p>I found it fascinating.</p>
<p>Here’s why.  John Adams, who believed that a strong central government was required to financially provide for the common welfare, and Thomas Jefferson, who believed that federal government should be limited so as not to infringe upon the independence of states, were close friends.  They competed politically.  Adams even lost the Presidency after a single term to Jefferson, but they remained cordial and, in a way, remained allies.</p>
<p>The two had common ground, a belief that individual freedoms should be upheld at all costs, lest the revolution be a vain pursuit, and the United States become just another tyrannical monarchy.</p>
<p>Today, the root of their two opposing beliefs remain, but the common ground has all but vanished. Instead of demanding our freedom to write, interpret and enforce our own law, we have lost interest in the governance of the United States and are content to rely on our elected officials to “know better” than we do.  So, when our legislators and executives take actions that are contrary to the wishes of the citizens they govern, we sit back and allow them to be re-elected, or worse, we begrudgingly pull the lever for one of a handful of pre-selected individuals that a group in Washington, over which we have no control, has selected for us.  Democrats may recall that sentiment in 1984, when Mondale was their only option.  For Republicans, it was McCain in 2008.</p>
<p>The truth is, I’m losing sympathy for my fellow Americans (myself included), who won’t bother to truly engage in the freedoms for which people like Adams and Jefferson risked their lives. Instead we take Rush’s word for it.  We take Matt Damon’s word for it.  We take anyone’s word for it except our own, and we choose from our pre-selected reality-show-esque candidates based upon surface-level impressions and sheer laziness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1-800-Oil-Soaked-Waterfowl by Andrew Runion</title>
		<link>http://www.katymcdermott.com/2010/07/04/1-800-oil-soaked-waterfowl/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Runion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katymcdermott.com/?p=288#comment-315</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m convinced that if this spill doesn&#039;t get your fur up, you probably don&#039;t have a pulse. Now, anyone who knows me will attest to my hatred of government interference in the free market and over-taxation of individuals and businesses. HOWEVER, when a company&#039;s desperate attempts to cut corners lead to a cataclysmic event that largely destroys an entire ecosystem and ruins the lives of American citizens for generations to come, I think it needs to be &quot;game over&quot; for that company. Such a company represents a clear and present danger to the welfare of the United States, the precise criteria our Senators use to declare war.

I think it goes too far to say that going after BP for money is the same as declaring war on big business, an argument I&#039;ve heard, by the way. I also think that calling the spill an &quot;accident&quot; is laughable. If a 300 pound man sits on a tricycle and it breaks. You don&#039;t call it an &quot;accident&quot;. You call it inevitable and shortsighted.

Even if the issue boils down to economics, an event that destroys so many people&#039;s ability to provide for their families is just as horrifying as taxing them into economic ruin. In fact, it&#039;s worse. If you feel like you&#039;re overtaxed, ideally, you can vote to change that, or to rebel, in the case of our forefathers. Yet, if someone clumsily dumps hundreds of metric tons of crude oil on your lemonade stand, you have no choice but to relocate, start squeezing out more lemony deliciousness, and say goodbye to your profits.

Speaking of profit, like I said, it should be game-over time for BP. Reparations must be made. This fat oaf just pooped on our petunias and they&#039;re going to have to clean it up. If the taxpayers shell out for this, we&#039;ll essentially be letting BP off the hook. &quot;It&#039;s okay BP. I&#039;ll take care of these dead petunias. You just go on being a fat clumsy oaf.&quot;

If I&#039;m saying this, a free-market capitalist, I&#039;m thinking this spill may be the most unifying issue in American political history since pearl harbor. Which begs the question why there&#039;s even a debate in Washington about who&#039;s going to pay for this mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m convinced that if this spill doesn&#8217;t get your fur up, you probably don&#8217;t have a pulse. Now, anyone who knows me will attest to my hatred of government interference in the free market and over-taxation of individuals and businesses. HOWEVER, when a company&#8217;s desperate attempts to cut corners lead to a cataclysmic event that largely destroys an entire ecosystem and ruins the lives of American citizens for generations to come, I think it needs to be &#8220;game over&#8221; for that company. Such a company represents a clear and present danger to the welfare of the United States, the precise criteria our Senators use to declare war.</p>
<p>I think it goes too far to say that going after BP for money is the same as declaring war on big business, an argument I&#8217;ve heard, by the way. I also think that calling the spill an &#8220;accident&#8221; is laughable. If a 300 pound man sits on a tricycle and it breaks. You don&#8217;t call it an &#8220;accident&#8221;. You call it inevitable and shortsighted.</p>
<p>Even if the issue boils down to economics, an event that destroys so many people&#8217;s ability to provide for their families is just as horrifying as taxing them into economic ruin. In fact, it&#8217;s worse. If you feel like you&#8217;re overtaxed, ideally, you can vote to change that, or to rebel, in the case of our forefathers. Yet, if someone clumsily dumps hundreds of metric tons of crude oil on your lemonade stand, you have no choice but to relocate, start squeezing out more lemony deliciousness, and say goodbye to your profits.</p>
<p>Speaking of profit, like I said, it should be game-over time for BP. Reparations must be made. This fat oaf just pooped on our petunias and they&#8217;re going to have to clean it up. If the taxpayers shell out for this, we&#8217;ll essentially be letting BP off the hook. &#8220;It&#8217;s okay BP. I&#8217;ll take care of these dead petunias. You just go on being a fat clumsy oaf.&#8221;</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m saying this, a free-market capitalist, I&#8217;m thinking this spill may be the most unifying issue in American political history since pearl harbor. Which begs the question why there&#8217;s even a debate in Washington about who&#8217;s going to pay for this mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1-800-Oil-Soaked-Waterfowl by Faith</title>
		<link>http://www.katymcdermott.com/2010/07/04/1-800-oil-soaked-waterfowl/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Faith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 18:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katymcdermott.com/?p=288#comment-314</guid>
		<description>Good piece, Katy.  

Unfortunately I think it does boil down to politics and our &quot;oil addiction&quot; (hate to quote GW on this but I think he was right).

I feel terrible for all those families and businesses destroyed by the spill.  What is the worst of all is that government agencies knew BP was cutting corners but chose to look the other way. 

At least we don&#039;t have to watch Tony Hayward on BP commercials anymore - I really hope they fire him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good piece, Katy.  </p>
<p>Unfortunately I think it does boil down to politics and our &#8220;oil addiction&#8221; (hate to quote GW on this but I think he was right).</p>
<p>I feel terrible for all those families and businesses destroyed by the spill.  What is the worst of all is that government agencies knew BP was cutting corners but chose to look the other way. </p>
<p>At least we don&#8217;t have to watch Tony Hayward on BP commercials anymore &#8211; I really hope they fire him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1-800-Oil-Soaked-Waterfowl by Katy</title>
		<link>http://www.katymcdermott.com/2010/07/04/1-800-oil-soaked-waterfowl/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Katy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 22:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katymcdermott.com/?p=288#comment-312</guid>
		<description>Wow - interesting points, Dee. I try to steer clear of politics in my writings, but this situation just got to me. A friend suggested I write about it, and I figured I&#039;d give it a shot... but I don&#039;t pretend to be the authoritative voice of anything! It&#039;s a complex situation with many many layers. And sadly, there is no magic wand (not in the government&#039;s hands, nor BP&#039;s, nor the Coast Guard&#039;s) - and anyone who thinks otherwise is living in a fantasy world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; interesting points, Dee. I try to steer clear of politics in my writings, but this situation just got to me. A friend suggested I write about it, and I figured I&#8217;d give it a shot&#8230; but I don&#8217;t pretend to be the authoritative voice of anything! It&#8217;s a complex situation with many many layers. And sadly, there is no magic wand (not in the government&#8217;s hands, nor BP&#8217;s, nor the Coast Guard&#8217;s) &#8211; and anyone who thinks otherwise is living in a fantasy world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1-800-Oil-Soaked-Waterfowl by Dee Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.katymcdermott.com/2010/07/04/1-800-oil-soaked-waterfowl/comment-page-1/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 20:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katymcdermott.com/?p=288#comment-311</guid>
		<description>I have mixed feelings about the victims, except for the animals, who break my heart. From what I&#039;ve heard, these same people are furious at the idea of a drilling moratorium. They continue to vote for politicians tucked so deeply inside the pockets of Big Oil that their whole beings are slimey. They hate Big Gummint and refuse to pay their fair share, yet the federal government, having been systematically starved for decades by their politicians, is supposed to wave a magic wand and fix it now.

No one is holding a telethon for the hundreds of thousands of middle-aged workers laid off during the banksters&#039; recession who will never work again and whose unemployment benefits the Republican senators just refused to extend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have mixed feelings about the victims, except for the animals, who break my heart. From what I&#8217;ve heard, these same people are furious at the idea of a drilling moratorium. They continue to vote for politicians tucked so deeply inside the pockets of Big Oil that their whole beings are slimey. They hate Big Gummint and refuse to pay their fair share, yet the federal government, having been systematically starved for decades by their politicians, is supposed to wave a magic wand and fix it now.</p>
<p>No one is holding a telethon for the hundreds of thousands of middle-aged workers laid off during the banksters&#8217; recession who will never work again and whose unemployment benefits the Republican senators just refused to extend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If the Shoe Fits, Buy It by Faith</title>
		<link>http://www.katymcdermott.com/2010/06/26/if-the-shoe-fits-buy-it/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Faith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katymcdermott.com/?p=286#comment-307</guid>
		<description>I get intimidated by all the fancy shoes out there too.  The ones that tone your butt crack me up!

Sounds like you and Caroline had fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get intimidated by all the fancy shoes out there too.  The ones that tone your butt crack me up!</p>
<p>Sounds like you and Caroline had fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If the Shoe Fits, Buy It by Katy</title>
		<link>http://www.katymcdermott.com/2010/06/26/if-the-shoe-fits-buy-it/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Katy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katymcdermott.com/?p=286#comment-306</guid>
		<description>Nope - Sex and the City is FAR too intimidating for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope &#8211; Sex and the City is FAR too intimidating for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
